Janmashtami— the
controversy over Krishna and Christ.
Jawhar Sircar
Krishna is
definitely a fascinating subject for scholars, whether religious or analytical,
but he troubles historians the most. Contrary to normal belief, Krishna is not
mentioned in the Vedas, and with great difficulty, we find his first undisputed
mention as a character only in the Chhandogya Upanishada of the seventh century
BC. He is also cited in the later Taittirya Aranyaka, but there is no reference
to the legend of his birth. This story enters our collective memory more than a
thousand years later, in the Vishnu Purana and the Hari-Vamsa of the 3rd or 4th
centuries of the Christian Era. In between, we do get some stray references in
a few sacred narratives, but Krishna was certainly not portrayed as the ‘great god’ that he
became in later tradition. Janmashtami is not mentioned as a popular
celebration and Krishna himself is completely overshadowed for several
centuries by Vasudeva and Balarama or Sankarsana. They were more powerful
deities in the pre-Christian era and Krishna often appeared as a ‘junior partner’ of Vasudeva or Balarama — till the
Gupta period, roughly the 3rd century AD.
The Mahabharata and the Gita came out
in their final shape around this time and it was only then that Krishna emerged more
prominently. This was also when the two major cults, Vaishnavaism and Shivaism
were contesting rivals and Krishna was presented as the supreme god of the
Vaishnavas. At this point, he subsumed both the earlier deities of Vasudeva and
Balarama into his own legend. We have a lot of evidence in Gupta and post-Gupta
sculpture portraying the miraculous deeds of the divine child. They valorise
him as the mascot of the new settled pastoral civilisation that arose on the
banks of the Yamuna. Eminent scholars
like DD Kosambi and Jan Gonda
(pronounced as Khonda) marvels at the various images and motifs of
the child god. Among them, the sculpture of Krishna holding Govardhana Hill
over his head to protect his people against torrential rains is a favourite.
Historians of religion view this as representing the victory the newly settled civilisations
and
their agriculture-cum-pastoral economy over the wandering animal-grazing
'Aryan' tribes — through the symbolic win of Krishna over the omnipotent
Indra.
Even so, we do not have sufficient
proof that Janmashtami was celebrated on such a grand scale during the Gupta
period and most scholars feel that this fervour picked up another millennium
later, during the Bhakti movement. Surdas, Meera and Bhakti poets played a
great role in the15th-16th centuries to portray Balagopala as a playful
loveable little god. The Shaivas had brought out the baby Ganesha, who found
instant popularity, therefore Vaishnavas required their own cuddling infant
god; Balakrishna. Radha, incidentally, was nowhere around the scene, she came
in only after the Bhagavata Purana was composed many centuries later. She
appeared in full form only when Jayadeva romanticised the divine couple. Later,
Vidyapati, Chandidas, Chaitanya, Surdas, Sankardeva and others popularised
lyrical romantic poems of Radha-Krishna.
Let us return to the 4th century texts
that mention Bala-gopala. We may note with interest that this is around the same
time when several tribes from western and central Asia had started settling in
India. They included the pastoral Abhiras, Gujjars and even Hunas, who took to
India's sacred traditions, but they also held on to their own stock of
colourful tales and ancient legends. Some scholars like RG Bhandarkar and
Sumanta Banerjee seriously felt that the Bala-Krishna legend came into India
from the Abhiras in this 'cultural exchange'. The fact that there were some
shared features with the Middle Eastern legends, however, gave rise to a raging
controversy in the colonial period. It was stoked in 1874 when Albrecht Weber
published his book, "An Investigation into the Origin of the Festival of
Krsna Janmastami". His logic was that, like Jesus Christ, Krishna was sent
by God to save the world and that both divinities were born in dreadful
circumstances. Jesus came to this world in a shabby stable that he shared with
animals and Krishna was born in a cold jail room. Both were among people
who also tended animals — Jesus was looked after by sheep herders and Krishna
was with the keepers of cows. Christ was hounded by cruel king Herod who wanted
to kill him instantly, just as Krishna was chased by the blood-thirsty tyrant
Kamsa.
Religious texts were quoted profusely,
as happens on such occasions, and even later scholars like James Kennedy and
Nicholas Macnicol were convinced that Janmashtami originated from Christian
tales. In 1895, Edward Hopkins declared that the entire miraculous story of the
birth of Krishna was taken from the Bible, while Steven Rosen claimed that the
whole "Hindu system of avataras or divine incarnations was borrowed from
the conception of Christ’s incarnation". Lorinser stated emphatically that
"the Bhagavad Gita was simply an expurgated New Testament”.
Poor Krishna! He had to tackle not only
Putana, the demoness and Kamsa his terrible uncle, but he now had also these
foreign scholars, to deal with just
because he happened to be born under such a star ! Earlier, Vedic devas
could afford heavenly or mysterious origins that are beyond our reach, but
after Buddhism proved so popular with definite but divine tales of the birth of their heroes, the new attractive
brand of Hindu deities also needed similar
birth legends. Characters in the Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas were
all born on this humble earth, but they were all accompanied by super-hit
stories of astounding miracles. This may explain why a date had to be found,
even if it is unsettled, as in the case of Gautama Buddha.
Even after two thousand years of
research and argument, the year of the birth of Jesus Christ remains unresolved
and the date varies among different groups of Christians between the nights of
24th of December and the 6th of January.
Religion is a matter of faith and ritual as well as a lot of festivity,
not an exercise in exact sciences. Besides, in the past, people were hardly
bothered about birth certificates, like schools insist nowadays, or even about
Aadhar cards.
The Ashatami of the Krishna-paksha of
Bhadra is normally too drenched for any open air fun, but despite this,
countless people brave the rains and visit temples. On Janmasthami, millions
throng them all over India. Mathura,
Vrindavan, Dwarka, Puri, Nabadwip, Guruvayoor, Udupi, Kanchipuram, Imphal and
other Vaishnava strongholds like the Naam-ghars of Assam. Often, Raas Lilas
depicting the dalliances of a mischievous youthful Krishna are considered the
best way to welcome his birth, which is putting the cart before the horse. In
many parts of India, devotees observe day-long fasts and recite from religious
texts as they celebrate Krishna's birth at midnight; with prasad and savouries.
Tamils draw figures of Balakrishna's tiny steps walking into their dwellings,
in the same way that Bengalis draw Alpana designs on the floor showing steps
for Lakshmi to come in.
On this Gokul-ashtami day, Maharashtrians
organise contests for youthful 'Govindas', to climb precariously on the
shoulders of friends, who are balanced in three or even four or five tiers,
with each group on the layer below, to form tall human pyramids. The successful
contesting group that manages to reach its 'Govinda'-boy to shatter the
curd-filled earthen pots that are strung up really quite high. The whole of
India is amazed at see the tenacity and the skill, as well as the risk-taking
ability of these young men. Tamils also have a similar tradition called Uriadi
and these highly skilled gymnastic displays give a lot of merriment but also
considerable amounts of prize money. One only wishes that this sport be
included in the next Olympic Games, because Indian men could then manage to win
at least one gold medal — with Lord Krishna’s infinite blessings — as they could
win none in the last Olympics.
No comments:
Post a Comment